Mielenkiintoinen henkilökuva foliohattujen puolijumalasta.
Potentiaalia olisi ollut vaikka mihin, mutta ylisuuri ego/vaikea persoona tuhosi uran ja nyt ukko on katkeralla ristiretkellä (ei sinällään täysin ennenkuulumatonta tiedeyhteisöissä), tod näk heräsi kun entiset kollegat alkoivat todella tienaamaan pitkäjänteisen työnsä tuloksilla. Malonen uskottavuus on pyöreä nolla, get over it.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/arc ... ic/619734/
The portrait they paint of Malone is of an insightful researcher who can be headstrong. They related accounts of him, pre-pandemic, getting booted from projects because he was hard to communicate with and unwilling to compromise. (Malone has acknowledged his penchant for butting heads with fellow scientists.) And they are taken aback by his emergence as a vaccine skeptic. One called his eagerness to appear on less-than-reputable podcasts “naive,” while another said he thought Malone’s public rhetoric had “migrated from extrapolated assertions to sensational assertions.” Stan Gromkowski, a cellular immunologist who did work on mRNA vaccines in the early 1990s and views Malone as an underappreciated pioneer, put it this way: “He’s fucking up his chances for a Nobel Prize.”