Marsalkka kirjoitti:
Löytyisitkö tästä helposti, nopeasti ja vaivattomasti faktaa? Itse en äkkiseltään löydä googlettamalla. En epäile asiaa, mutta mielelläni lukisin hieman tarkemmin tästä.
Katson PJ:n loppuraportin vaikka huomeanna mutta vaikka ensimmäiseksi tästä lähteestä joka ensimmäisenä löytyi:
http://madeleinefoundation.org/main/30-reasons/
Lainaan:" The blood found by Keela was by then degraded, quite possibly as the result of cleaning agents having been used, and the FSS lab was able to check only 5 markers.
Each one of those 5 markers matched Madeleine’s DNA - or, to re-phrase this a different way, there were no markers that could not have come from Madeleine, so the idea that it was her blood could most certainly not be discounted.
As for the Renault Scenic, registration no. 59-DA-27, Eddie and Keela both clearly marked the same car and the same location within the car. The blood found there by Keela (beneath the carpeting in the boot) was also degraded. But the FSS lab was able, on its first analysis, to check 15 markers.
All of these 15 markers matched Madeleine’s DNA - again, meaning that there were no markers within these 15 that could not have come from Madeleine.
A second result showed the same 15 markers, but among a total of 37 markers. An individual only has 19 ‘markers’. That means that the sample from the car had been contaminated by DNA from another individual.
However, with 15 markers all matching Madeleine’s DNA, that would still give analysts 99.9% confidence that the samples were from Madeleine.
The DNA of the degraded blood was found not to match with the DNA of the twins, Sean and Amelie."
Huomioi myös seuraava kommentti: "The law differs from country to country as to how many out of an individual’s 19 DNA ‘markers’ are needed to prove that any DNA sample comes from that individual. Many countries accept 15 markers as sufficient proof. Under Portuguese law, however, the courts require all 19 markers to be confirmed.
This was ‘Low Copy Number’ DNA and so all 19 markers could not be obtained.
We might add here that when the British police cross-check the DNA of a suspect with its database said to consist of 2.5 million people who have been arrested on suspicion of a crime, they use only 10 markers in order to establish a DNA ‘match’. The scientist who invented DNA fingerprinting two decades ago, Professor Sir Alec Jeffreys, said however that using 10 markers to obtain a sufficiently reliable ‘match’ was insufficient proof. He went on to state that 15 markers would be provide sufficient evidence to be conclusive. He said:
“The current DNA database uses 10 distinct markers to obtain a match and this means there is still a residual risk of a false match. They should use about 15 markers; 15 markers would close the possibility that the match from a crime scene sample is genuine but a fluke”.
The FSS were able to confirm that the results of the analysis were ‘indicative’ that the blood found was Madeleine’s. We might, without exaggeration, state that these DNA results were ‘highly indicative’ that it was Madeleine’s blood that was found. But the FSS felt unable to say that these DNA results, on their own, were ‘conclusive’.
The key point to be made is this. The FSS results, on their own, do not provide absolute proof that the blood in the apartment and in the hired car was Madeleine’s. But these strongly indicative results - with all 5 markers in one sample and all 15 in another that could not have come from Madeleine - must be taken together with all the other evidence in this case. We can surely say with confidence that the chance of those 15 markers belonging to someone other than Madeleine is next-to-nothing, especially when we take into account other significant circumstantial evidence.”
. En vaan osaa mennä sanomaan kauanko se etsiminen kestää. Palataan asiaan...
Faktoja lukiessani olen saanut tietää ettei haju tartu tuolla tavalla; pitää olla siis se haju siinä olemassa, siis leijumassa. Dna-näytteitä voi olla niin monia; mistä siis tiedät että se olisi Madeleinen ja sekään ei todista sitä, koska dna ja ruumiin haju ovat kaksi eri asiaa. 