Lähetetty: Su Maalis 16, 2008 4:14 pm
Hienoa, eli mikä on tieteen tämän hetken näkemys tähän musikaalisuusasiaan?
Suomen johtava rikosaiheinen portaali
https://www.murha.info/rikosfoorumi/
ABC kirjoitti:Vastuuntunnottomasti toimivat mielestäni myös henkilöt, jotka esim. ovat molemmat syntymäkuuroja ja saavat sitten kuuroja lapsia.
Eppu74 kirjoitti:Täysin samaa mieltä.
Molemmista syistä. Mielestäni ei ole yleismaailmallisesti järkevää tietoisesti lisätä kehitysvammaisten määrää ja eiköhän tuo onnellisuuskin pidä keskimäärin paikkansa.tre_1982 kirjoitti:Miksi ei? Yhteiskunnallisista syistäkö? Vai olisivatko lapset sitten jotenkin onnettomampia kun ovat kuuroja?
Suojaikäraja on Saksassa 16 vuotta.cicero kirjoitti:käsittääkseni saksassa 16-vuotias on alaikäinen mitä seksin suhteen tulee eli kyse on alaikäisen hyväksikäytöstä...
anneli1 kirjoitti:Tästä keskustelusta (nyt tarkoitan keskustelun tasoa) ei puutu kuin että joku frenologian maisteri vielä kantaisi kortensa kekoon kallonmuodontutkimuksineen..
Eihän tässä nyt ole siitä kyse, että ei kunnioitettaisi kaikkea elämää tai vähäteltäisiin jonkun elämän arvoa. Kyse on siitä, että tieten tahtoen tuottaa vammaisia jälkeläisiä. Ihan varmasti lievästi vammaiset voivat olla onnellisiakin, mutta on mielestäni käsittämätöntä että joku voi haluta lasta niin paljon, että on valmis ottamaan sen riskin että lapsi kärsii vammaisuutensa kanssa koko elämänsä. Itse en sellaista lapselleni tekisi, ja jos minussa joskus todetaan jonkinnäköinen piilevä sairaus jonka mahdollinen jälkeläiseni sitten saisi, jätän lapset tekemättä.PaulaDrew kirjoitti:Minusta on kovin kummallinen tuo näkökanta että mieluummin ei elämää ollenkaan, jos kaikki ei ole täydellisesti. Uskon, että myös kuuro voi elää täysipainoista elämää. Vaikeaa sanoa, kun itse on terve, mutta esimerkiksi Kalle Könkkölä kirjoittaa painavaa asiaa tästä aiheesta kirjassaan Huoneekseni tuli maailma. On loukkaavaa ajatella, ettei vaikkapa hänen elämänsä olisi elämisen arvoista, vaikka se vaikeaa on ollutkin, tai että hänen olisi ollut parempi olla syntymättä.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6424937.stmCouple stand by forbidden love
At their home in Leipzig, Patrick Stuebing and Susan Karolewski are in the kitchen, playing with a young toddler.
They share a small flat in an east German tower block on the outskirts of the city. It looks like an ordinary family scene, but Patrick is Susan's brother and they are lovers.
"Many people see it as a crime, but we've done nothing wrong," said Patrick, an unemployed locksmith.
"We are like normal lovers. We want to have a family. Our whole family broke apart when we were younger, and after that happened, Susan and I were brought closer together," he said.
Patrick, who is 30 years old, was adopted and, as a child, he lived in Potsdam.
He did not meet his mother and biological family until he was 23. He travelled to Leipzig with a friend in 2000, determined to make contact with his other relatives.
He met his sister Susan for the first time, and according to the couple, after their mother died, they fell in love.
"When I was younger, I didn't know that I had a brother. I met Patrick and I was so surprised," said Susan, who is 22.
She says she does not feel guilty about their relationship.
"I hope this law will be overturned," Susan said.
"I just want to live with my family, and be left alone by the authorities and by the courts," she went on, in a hardly audible voice.
Jail sentence
Patrick and Susan have been living together for the last six years, and they now have four children.
The authorities placed their first son, Eric, in the care of a foster family, and two other children were also placed in care.
"Our children are with foster parents. We talk to them as often as possible, but the authorities have taken away so much from us," said Susan.
"We only have our little daughter, Sofia, who is living with us," she said.
Incest is a criminal offence in Germany. Patrick Stuebing has already served a two-year sentence for committing incest and there is another jail term looming if paragraph 173 of the legal code is not overturned.
The couple's lawyer, Endrik Wilhelm, has lodged an appeal with Germany's highest judicial body, the federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe, in order to overturn the country's ban on incest.
"Under Germany's criminal code, which dates back to 1871, it is a crime for close relatives to have sex and it's punishable by up to three years in prison. This law is out of date and it breaches the couple's civil rights," Dr Wilhelm said.
"Why are disabled parents allowed to have children, or people with hereditary diseases or women over 40? No-one says that is a crime.
"This couple are not harming anyone. It is discrimination. And besides, we must not forget that every child is so valuable," said Dr Wilhelm.
The couple's case is controversial and it has prompted a heated debate in the media.
"We need this law against incest in Germany and in the whole of Europe," said Professor Juergen Kunze, a geneticist at Berlin's Charite Hospital.
"It is based on long traditions in Western societies, and the law is here for a good reason," said Prof Kunze.
"Medical research has shown that there is a higher risk of genetic abnormalities when close relatives have a child together. When siblings have children, there is a 50% chance that the child will be disabled," he said.
Patrick and Susan say they have no other choice but to fight the current law.
"I have read that some doctors claim that children born to siblings could be disabled, but what about disabled parents who have children, or older parents?" asked Patrick.
"People have said that our children are disabled, but that is wrong. They are not disabled," said Patrick.
"Eric, our eldest child, has epilepsy, but he was born two months premature, he also has learning difficulties. Our other daughter, Sarah, has special needs," Patrick said.
Ruling soon
The couple claim they have received a lot of support from friends and neighbours.
"When we go out to the supermarket, people recognise us and many have told us that they support our legal challenge," said Patrick.
"We would like society to recognise us, as any other normal couple," he said.
In 2004, Patrick voluntarily underwent a vasectomy.
"It's legal for the couple to live together, and to share a bed. But they are breaking the law once they have sex. If there are no more children, then who will be able to prove that they are a couple?" asked their lawyer.
Dr Wilhelm said a ruling was expected in the next few months.
"We've already heard that the vice-president of the Constitutional Court said that there will be a 'fundamental discussion' about this issue in Germany," said Dr Wilhelm.
"Many criminal law experts say that we are right and I'm confident that my clients will win their case. The law against incest is based on very old moral principles. The law was abolished in France, it's about time it should be scrapped here in Germany as well."
täällä asui joskus sellainen pari jotka olivat isä ja tytär,ja tytöllä oli lapsi veljensä kanssa myös.se lapsi oli ainakin täysi vajakki.oikein tyypillinen sukurutsan tulosesmes- kirjoitti:miksihän ne lapset on pitänyt ottaa huostaan? ovatko olleet erityisen huonoja vanhempia kun ovat sukuakin keskenään? ovatko täyssisaruksia vai sisarpuolia? olen käsittänyt että jälkikasvun geeniperimä alkaa heiketä vasta monta sukupolvea jatkuneen sukurutsan tuloksena eikä heti siitä jos sisarukset/lapsi ja vanhempi lisääntyvät keskenään. hmm
Koska miesten alistaminen on otettu salaiseksi, maailmanlaajuiseksi operaatioksi. Sinä olet seuraava.markja kirjoitti:Siis HETKONEN, HETKONEN...
MIKSI VAIN MIES SAI TUOMION?!? MIKSEI NAISTAKIN TUOMITTU?!?
Onpas sarkastista.joey kirjoitti:Koska miesten alistaminen on otettu salaiseksi, maailmanlaajuiseksi operaatioksi. Sinä olet seuraava.