(Ja edelleenkään todellisuus ei ole feministipaskaa, vaan raakaa todellisuutta eikä vhm:iä uhreiksi kääntävää hommatodellisuutta - joo media ja äärifeministit + äärisuvaitsevaisto voi vetää tämän överiksi, mutta se erikseen todellisuudesta. Minulla ei olisi miehenäkään vaikeuksia käsitellä todellisuutta, näihin asioihin sanoisin että helvetin ikävää ja suhtautuisin asiallisesti vasten seksuaalirikoksia. )
Uusinta päivitystä Jenkkilästä. Weisteinin naispuoliset työntekijät ovat joutuneet myös uhan alle, ja heitä on käytetty "honey potteina" houkuttelemaan läsnäolollaan nuoria naisia Weinsteinin seuraan. Mutta kuinka raadollista on todellisuus, sitä tulee miettineeksi jutun luettuaan. Ovatko Weinsteinin työntekijät tienneet, mihin ovat osallistuneet (jotenkin luultavaa, mielestäni) vai ihanko puhtaasti eivät mitään ymmärtäneet - jutun mukaan osa olisi tiennyt, osa ei niinkään.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/o ... afe-either..
The women who have accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual abuse spoke of the same tactic: the movie producer would make young women feel safe with the presence of his female assistants, who would later disappear, leaving the mogul alone to harass and assault his guests, they alleged.
After a week of reading stories casting blame on Weinstein’s female employees, one former assistant said she wanted to speak up and make clear that the situation was much more complicated. She and other women at his company were also victims of Weinstein’s abuse – regularly exploited and manipulated, leaving some severely traumatized, the woman alleged in a recent interview with the Guardian.
“We weren’t safe either,” said the woman, who worked closely with Weinstein as an assistant in London in the last five years and requested anonymity. “It was an abusive relationship on every level.”
It’s not just one monster. ‘Me too’ reveals the ubiquity of sexual assault
The woman, who was in her early 30s when she was employed at the Weinstein Company, echoed the complaints of others who have worked for the disgraced producer, alleging that his staff was forced to do demeaning and humiliating tasks to facilitate and cover up his philandering. Many, including her, she claimed, didn’t suspect they were enabling sexual assault or rape.
“He had manipulated everyone in his path with that one purpose, and that was for sex,” she said. “It’s awful. I should have walked out. I should have said something.”
Weinstein has been fired from his company and widely denounced by Hollywood following a slew of accusations that he sexually harassed and assaulted young women, allegedly inviting models and actors to hotel rooms for business purposes before demanding massages and sex. The scandal has launched criminal investigations and has inspired women across the industry to speak up about misconduct by powerful men.
The New Yorker investigation, which uncovered rape allegations, claimed that women at the company served as a “honeypot”, helping lure his victims.
The former UK assistant said she was heartbroken to read about the assault claims, and that while some close associates may have known what was happening, she claimed that women like her were not willing collaborators and had also suffered through verbal abuse, vicious threats and intimidation.
“We were in danger, too,” she said, adding that she had joined the company with aspirations of advancing in the film industry. “You think you’re going to get this illustrious career. You really want to believe you are going to succeed. He preys on this. He preys on young, vulnerable people he can manipulate.”//
